• Log In
  • Skip to content

ILSSC

Irvine Lab for the Study of Space and Crime

  • Home
  • Welcome
  • Who We Are
    • Directors
    • Graduate Students
    • Laboratory Alumni
  • Research
    • Funded Research Projects
    • “People and Places in Context” Symposium
    • SoCal Crime Study
    • National Incident Crime Study (NICS)
    • Stata Code
  • Publications
    • Publications
    • Crime Report
    • Technical Reports
  • Opportunities
    • Postdoctoral Opportunities
    • Graduate Opportunities
    • Undergrad Opportunities
  • News

New lab publication on crime concentration and spatial scales (Online first)

August 15, 2017 by batesc

You can now access an online first article by Dr. John R. Hipp, Dr. James C. Wo, & Young-An Kim in the Social Science Research entitled, “Studying neighborhood crime across different macro spatial scales: The case of robbery in 4 cities”. The article examines crime variation across macro-environments & micro-geographic units four cities.

Get it here:

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X16307931

Abstract:

Whereas there is a burgeoning literature focusing on the spatial distribution of crime events across neighborhoods or micro-geographic units in a specific city, the present study expands this line of research by selecting four cities that vary across two macro-spatial dimensions: population in the micro-environment, and population in the broader macro-environment. We assess the relationship between measures constructed at different spatial scales and robbery rates in blocks in four cities: 1) San Francisco (high in micro- and macro-environment population); 2) Honolulu (high in micro- but low in macro-environment population); 3) Los Angeles (low in micro- but high in macro-environment population); 4) Sacramento (low in micro- and macro-environment population). Whereas the socio-demographic characteristics of residents further than ½ mile away do not impact robbery rates, the number of people up to 2.5 miles away are related to robbery rates, especially in the two cities with smaller micro-environment population, implying a larger spatial scale than is often considered. The results show that coefficient estimates differ somewhat more between cities differing in micro-environment population compared to those differing based on macro-environment population. It is therefore necessary to consider the broader macro-environment even when focusing on the level of crime across neighborhoods or micro-geographic units within an area.

Filed Under: Publications

Reader Interactions

© 2025 UC Regents